Pre-Operative Planning And Manufacturing Method For Orthopedic Procedure

ABSTRACT

A pre-operative planning and manufacturing method for orthopedic surgery includes obtaining pre-operative medical image data representing a joint portion of a patient. The method also includes constructing a three-dimensional digital model of the joint portion and manufacturing a patient-specific alignment guide for the joint portion from the three-dimensional digital model of the joint portion when the image data is sufficient to construct the three-dimensional digital model of the joint portion. The patient-specific alignment guide has a three-dimensional patient-specific surface pre-operatively configured to nest and closely conform to a corresponding surface of the joint portion of the patient in only one position relative to the joint portion. The method further includes determining, from the image data, a size of a non-custom implant to be implanted in the patient and assembling a surgical kit including the non-custom implant when there is insufficient image data to construct the patient-specific alignment guide therefrom.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No.13/153,760 filed on Jun. 6, 2011. The entire disclosure of the aboveapplication is incorporated herein by reference.

INTRODUCTION

The present teachings provide various methods of pre-operative planningand manufacturing for orthopedic procedures.

SUMMARY

The present teachings provide a pre-operative planning and manufacturingmethod for orthopedic surgery. The method includes obtainingpre-operative medical image data representing a joint portion of apatient. The method also includes constructing a three-dimensionaldigital model of the joint portion and manufacturing a patient-specificalignment guide for the joint portion from the three-dimensional digitalmodel of the joint portion when the image data is sufficient toconstruct the three-dimensional digital model of the joint portion. Thepatient-specific alignment guide has a three-dimensionalpatient-specific surface pre-operatively configured to nest and closelyconform to a corresponding surface of the joint portion of the patientin only one position relative to the joint portion. The method furtherincludes determining, from the image data, a size of a non-customimplant to be implanted in the patient and manufacturing the non-customimplant when there is insufficient image data to construct thepatient-specific alignment guide therefrom.

A pre-operative planning and manufacturing method for orthopedic surgeryis also disclosed. The method includes pre-operatively obtaining medicalimage data that is readable on a computer. The medical image datacontains a plurality of two-dimensional medical images of a jointportion of a patient. The method also includes pre-operativelyconstructing a three-dimensional digital model of the joint portion fromthe plurality of two-dimensional medical images and displaying thethree-dimensional digital model on a display of the computer when theplurality of two-dimensional medical images are sufficient to constructthe three-dimensional digital model of the joint portion. Furthermore,the method includes selecting, based on the image data, a non-customimplant to be implanted in the patient and providing the non-customimplant when the plurality of two-dimensional medical images areinsufficient for use in constructing a patient-specific alignment guidehaving a three-dimensional patient-specific surface configured to nestand closely conform to a corresponding surface of the joint portion ofthe patient in only one position relative to the joint portion. Thenon-custom implant is chosen from a group of non-custom implants ofdifferent sizes.

Moreover, a computerized pre-operative planning tool for planning anorthopedic surgical procedure is disclosed. The tool includes a receiverdevice that receives medical image data containing a plurality oftwo-dimensional medical images of a joint portion of a patient. The toolalso includes a processor that determines whether the medical image datais sufficient for constructing a three-dimensional digital model of thejoint portion from the plurality of two-dimensional medical images. Theprocessor is additionally configured to construct the three-dimensionaldigital model when the medical image data is sufficient to construct thethree-dimensional digital model. The processor is further configured toconstruct a patient-specific digital model of a patient-specificalignment guide when the medical image data is sufficient to constructthe three-dimensional digital model. The patient-specific alignmentguide has a three-dimensional surface that nests against a correspondingsurface of the three-dimensional digital model of the joint portion.Additionally, the tool includes a display that displays thethree-dimensional digital model of the joint portion and the patientspecific digital model of the patient-specific alignment guide when theprocessor determines that the medical image data is sufficient forconstructing the three-dimensional digital model of the joint portion.The display also displays at least one of the two-dimensional medicalimages of the joint portion for selection of a non-custom implant whenthe processor determines that the medical image data is insufficient forconstructing the patient-specific alignment guide therefrom.

Still further, a pre-operative planning and manufacturing method fororthopedic surgery of a knee joint of a patient is disclosed. The methodincludes obtaining pre-operative medical image data representing theknee joint, wherein the medical image data includes a plurality oftwo-dimensional images of the knee joint. The method also includesconstructing a three-dimensional digital model of the knee joint andmanufacturing a patient-specific alignment guide for the knee joint fromthe three-dimensional digital model of the knee joint when the pluralityof two-dimensional images of the knee joint is sufficient to constructthe three-dimensional digital model of the knee joint. Thepatient-specific alignment guide has a three-dimensionalpatient-specific surface pre-operatively configured to nest and closelyconform to a corresponding surface of the knee joint of the patient inonly one position relative to the knee joint. The method also includesdetermining, based on at least one of the two-dimensional images of theknee joint, a size of a non-custom implant to be implanted in the kneejoint of the patient when there is insufficient image data to constructthe patient-specific alignment guide therefrom. Additionally, the methodincludes determining a dimension for a non-custom surgical instrumentconfigured for implanting the non-custom implant when there isinsufficient image data to construct the patient-specific alignmentguide therefrom. Moreover, the method includes manufacturing at leastone of the non-custom implant and the non-custom surgical instrumentwhen there is insufficient image data to construct the patient-specificalignment guide therefrom. Furthermore, the method includes assembling akit containing the non-custom implant and the non-custom surgicalinstrument when there is insufficient image data to construct thepatient-specific alignment guide therefrom.

Further areas of applicability of the present teachings will becomeapparent from the description provided hereinafter. It should beunderstood that the description and specific examples are intended forpurposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope ofthe present teachings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present teachings will become more fully understood from thedetailed description and the accompanying drawings, wherein:

FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of a pre-operative planning toolaccording to various exemplary embodiments of the present teachings;

FIG. 2 is a flowchart of a method of a pre-operative planning andmanufacturing method according to various exemplary embodiments of thepresent teachings;

FIG. 3 is a two-dimensional image of a knee joint used in thepre-operative planning methods of the present teachings;

FIG. 4A is a three-dimensional digital model of a femur with apatient-specific alignment guide according to the present teachings;

FIG. 4B is a three-dimensional digital model of a tibia with apatient-specific alignment guide according to the present teachings;

FIG. 5 is an isometric view of a femoral component of a knee prosthesis;and

FIG. 6 is a schematic illustration of a kit containing components forimplanting a knee prosthesis.

DESCRIPTION OF VARIOUS ASPECTS

The following description is merely exemplary in nature and is in no wayintended to limit the present teachings, applications, or uses. Forexample, although some of the present teachings are presented inrelation to surgical planning for implanting a knee joint prosthesis,the present teachings can be employed for planning surgical implantationof any prosthetic device.

The present teachings provide various pre-operative planning methods fororthopedic procedures. For instance, the present teachings can beemployed for planning partial or total knee joint replacement surgery.Specifically, image data from medical scans of the patient can beprovided, and if there is sufficient two-dimensional image data, anaccurate three-dimensional digital model of the knee joint can begenerated as well as a three-dimensional digital model of apatient-specific alignment guide. If there is insufficienttwo-dimensional image data to generate the three-dimensional digitalmodel and a patient-specific alignment guide therefrom, the image datacan still be used to determine a size of a non-custom prosthesis to beimplanted. The image data can also be used to determine sizes anddimensions for instruments (e.g., resection guides, etc.) that will beused during surgery. Moreover, a kit can be pre-operatively assembledcontaining the selected alignment guide(s), prosthetic device(s), trialprosthetic device(s), instruments, etc. that will be used during surgeryfor a particular patient. These methods can, therefore, makepre-operative planning more efficient. Also, the surgical procedure canbe more efficient since the prosthetic device and the related surgicalimplements can be tailored for the particular patient.

Referring initially to FIG. 1, a pre-operative planning tool 10 isillustrated. The tool 10 can be computer-based and can generally includea receiving device 12, a processor 14, a memory device 16, and a display18.

The receiving device 12 can receive medical image data 20 of a jointportion 24 (e.g., a knee joint) of a patient. Representative image data20 of a knee joint portion 24 (including a femur F and a tibia T) of apatient is illustrated in FIG. 3. It will be appreciated that the imagedata 20 can include any number of images of the joint portion 24, takenfrom any viewing perspective.

Specifically, the receiving device 12 can receive medical scans preparedby a Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) device, a Computed Tomography (CT)scanner, a radiography or X-ray machine, an ultrasound machine, a cameraor any other imaging device 22. The imaging device 22 can be used togenerate electronic (e.g., digital) image data 20. The image data 20 canbe stored on a physical medium, such as a CD, DVD, flash memory device(e.g. memory stick, compact flash, secure digital card), or otherstorage device, and this data 20 can be uploaded to the tool 10 via acorresponding drive or other port of the receiving device 12. The imagedata 20 may alternatively, or in addition, be transmitted electronicallyto the receiving device 12 via the Internet or worldwide web usingappropriate transfer protocols. Also, electronic transmissions caninclude e-mail or other digital transmission to any appropriate type ofcomputer device, smart phone, PDA or other devices in which electronicinformation can be transmitted.

The memory device 16 can be of any suitable type (RAM and/or ROM), andthe medical image data 20 can be inputted and stored in the memorydevice 16. The memory device 16 can also store any suitable software andprogrammed logic thereon for completing the pre-operative planningdiscussed herein. For instance, the memory device 16 can includecommercially-available software, such as software from Materialise USAof Plymouth, Mich.

The processor 14 can be of a known type for performing variouscalculations, analyzing the data, and other processes discussedhereinbelow. Also, the display 18 can be a display of a computerterminal or portable device, such as an electronic tablet, or any othertype of display. As will be discussed, the display 18 can be used fordisplaying the medical image data 20 and/or displaying digitalanatomical models generated from the image data 20 and/or displayingother images, text, graphics, or objects.

It will also be appreciated that the pre-operative planning tool 10 caninclude other components that are not illustrated. For instance, theplanning tool 10 can include an input device, such as a physical orelectronic keyboard, a joystick, a touch-sensitive pad, or any otherdevice for inputting user controls.

As will be discussed, the image data 20 can be analyzed and reviewed(manually or automatically) using the tool 10 to determine whether theimage data 20 is sufficient enough to generate and construct athree-dimensional (3-d) digital model 26 a, 26 b of the joint 24. (Arepresentative 3-d digital model 26 a of the patient's femur F isillustrated in FIG. 4A, and a representative 3-d digital model 26 b ofthe patient's tibia T is illustrated in FIG. 4B.)

For instance, if the image data 20 was collected by MRI or otherhigher-resolution imaging device, there are likely to be a relativelylarge number of two-dimensional images of the joint 24 taken atdifferent anatomical depths, and these images can be virtually assembled(“stacked”) by the processor 14 to generate the three-dimensionalelectronic digital model 26 a, 26 b of the patient's anatomy. Usingthese digital models 26 a, 26 b, a first surgical plan 30 (FIG. 1) canbe generated, and a corresponding kit 33 can be manufactured andassembled. As will be discussed, the kit 33 can include the physicalcomponents necessary for surgery, including patient-specific alignmentguide(s), selected prosthetic devices, trial prosthetic devices,surgical instruments, and more. The kit 33 can be sterilized and shippedto be available for surgery for that particular patient.

However, if the image data 20 was collected by X-ray or otherlower-resolution imaging device, there is unlikely to be sufficient dataabout the joint 24 to generate accurate three-dimensional digital models26 a, 26 b. Regardless, the two-dimensional image data 20 can still beused to generate a second surgical plan 32 as shown in FIG. 1, and acorresponding kit 34 can be assembled. The kit 34 can include a selectednon-patient-specific (non-custom) implant, trial implant, surgicalinstruments, and more. However, the items within the kit 34 can besize-specific (i.e., the size of the items in the kit 34 can bepre-operatively selected for the particular patient).

It will be appreciated that the same tool 10 can be used for planningpurposes, regardless of whether the image data 20 is sufficient togenerate three-dimensional digital models of the joint 24 or not. Thus,for instance, if the patient is able and willing to undergo MRI toobtain highly detailed images as recommended by the surgeon, the tool 10can be used to generate a surgical plan 30 and to manufacture implementsthat are highly customized for that patient. Otherwise, if the patientis unable or unwilling to undergo MRI (e.g., because the patient has apacemaker, because the patient has claustrophobia, because MRI is notrecommended by the surgeon, etc.), the tool 10 can still be used togenerate the surgical plan 32, albeit with implements that are selectedfrom inventory or manufactured on a non-custom basis. In either case,the surgery can be planned and carried out efficiently.

Referring now to FIG. 2, a method 40 of using the tool 10 will bediscussed. The method 40 can begin in block 42, in which the image data20 is obtained. As mentioned above, the image data 20 can be obtainedfrom an MRI device, an X-ray device, or the like. In the case of data 20obtained by X-ray, one or more radio-opaque (e.g., magnetic) markers orscaling devices 43 can be used as shown in FIG. 3. These devices 43 canbe of a known size and shape. For instance, the devices 43 can be discsthat measure ten centimeters in diameter, or the devices 43 can beelongate strips or other shapes with known dimensions. The devices 43can be placed over the patient's knee joint 24 before the X-ray istaken. The devices 43 will be very visible in the X-ray image. Since theactual size of the devices 43 are known, the size of the device 43 canbe compared against the anatomical measurements taken from the image,and the scale of anatomy in the image can be thereby detected.

Next, as shown in FIG. 2, the method 40 can continue in block 44, inwhich the image data 20 can be evaluated, and in block 46, it can bedetermined whether there is enough data to generate accurate 3-d digitalmodel(s) 26 a, 26 b of the joint 24. “Accurate” in this context meansthat the image data 20 is sufficient and detailed enough to generateprecise representations of the anatomical joint 24. More specifically,“accurate 3-d models” are those that are detailed and precise enough toconstruct a patient-specific alignment guide therefrom.(Patient-specific alignment guides will be discussed in greater detailbelow.) It is noted that three 3-d models can still be generated from alesser or insufficient number of medical scans, although such 3-d modelswill not be accurate enough to generate patient-specific alignmentguides that mirror the corresponding joint surfaces of the specificpatients.

In some embodiments, the processor 14 can analyze the data 20 toautomatically determine if it is sufficient to model the complex,three-dimensionally curved surfaces of the distal end of the femur F andthe proximate end of the tibia T. In other embodiments, the tool 10 canautomatically detect whether the data 20 is MRI data (higher-resolutiondata) or X-ray data (lower-resolution data). If the data 20 is MRI data,then the digital models 26 a, 26 b can be generated and block 46 isanswered affirmatively. If the data 20 is X-ray data, then the digitalmodels 26 a, 26 b cannot be generated and block 46 is answerednegatively.

If decision block is answered in the affirmative, then block 48 follows,and the digital models 26 a, 26 b are generated as represented in FIGS.4A and 4B. These digital models 26 a, 26 b can be displayed on thedisplay 18. Subsequently in block 49, the first surgical plan 30 isgenerated. Specifically, various dimensions of the femur F and tibia Tcan be automatically detected from the digital models 26 a, 26 b, themechanical axis of the joint 24 can be detected from the digital models26 a, 26 b, resection plane(s) for the femur F and tibia T can beplanned according to the digital models 26 a, 26 b, soft tissue can beanalyzed in the digital models, etc. A prosthetic implant assembly 60(FIG. 6) can then be selected and/or designed according to thisanalysis.

More specifically, as shown in FIG. 6 various inventories 70, 72 ofdifferently sized prosthetic implant assemblies 60 can be provided. Theinventory 70 can include components for a full knee replacement, and theinventory 72 can include components for a partial knee replacement. Fromthe digital models 26 a, 26 b, the surgeon can decide to do a full kneereplacement, as represented in FIG. 6. From the digital models 26 a, 26b, the surgeon can also determine the size of the prosthetic implantassembly 60 that is appropriate for the patient. Thus, the surgeon candetermine the size and other appropriate features for a femoralcomponent 62, a tibial component 64 (tibial tray), a bearing 66, and oneor more fasteners 68 for the patient. Each of these components 62, 64,66, 68 can be individually selected from the inventory 70.

In some embodiments, the prosthetic implant assembly 60 can be selectedfrom non-custom, inventoried components of the commercially-availableVANGUARD™ complete knee system of Biomet, Inc. of Warsaw, Ind. Thesurgeon also has the option of selecting components from the otherinventory 72, such as partial knee prosthetic implants of the OXFORD™partial knee system of Biomet, Inc. of Warsaw, Ind. In still othercases, the surgeon can design a patient-specific prosthetic implant(i.e., one that is customized, non-inventoried, and intended for asingle patient). In any case, the surgeon can rely on the digital models26 a, 26 b for selecting and/or designing the most appropriate implantassembly 60 for restoring function of the joint 24. It will beappreciated that the prosthetic implant assembly 60 can be selected fromany one of various types, such as bilateral or unilateral implants,constrained, semi-constrained, mobile types, etc. It will also beappreciated that the components 62, 64, 66, 68 may not be stocked ininventory, and the components 62, 64, 66, 68 can be manufacturedon-demand.

A resection guide 80 can also be selected from an inventory 82 ofdifferent resection guides of different sizes and dimensions. Theresection guide 80 can include one or more guide surfaces (e.g.,grooves, or slots) used for guiding a resection tool while resecting thebones F, T. The resection guide 80 can be selected such that theresection plane(s) will be located as determined in block 49. Theresection guide 80 can be of any suitable type, such as a 4-in-1 femoralcut block, which is commercially available from Biomet, Inc. of Warsaw,Ind. Resection guides can also be selected for resecting the tibia T aswell.

Once the surgical plan has been generated in block 49, block 50 followsas shown in FIG. 2. In block 50, patient-specific alignment guides 36 a,36 b (FIGS. 4A and 4B) can be designed according to the anatomicaldigital models 26 a, 26 b and according to the prosthetic implantassembly 60 selected in block 49. Patient-specific alignment guides 36a, 36 b and their method of manufacture are disclosed and described indetail in the commonly-owned, co-pending U.S. patent application Ser.No. 11/756,057, filed on May 31, 2007, and published as U.S. PatentPublication No. 2007/0288030, which is hereby incorporated herein byreference in its entirety. The femoral alignment guide 36 a can beconfigured to include a three-dimensional patient-specific surface 52 athat nests and closely conforms to a corresponding surface 51 a of thedistal femur F in only one position (with or without articularcartilage). Likewise, the tibial alignment guide 36 b can be configuredto include a three-dimensional patient-specific surface 52 b that nestsand closely conforms to a corresponding surface 51 b of the proximaltibia T in only one position (with or without articular cartilage).Furthermore, the alignment guides 36 a, 36 b can each be designed toinclude respective alignment holes 54 a, 54 b at predetermined locationsrelative to the bones F, T. The alignment holes 54 a, 54 b can bepositioned relative to the bones F, T for aligning surgical instruments(drill guides, resection guides, etc.).

Next, in block 53, the alignment guides 36 a, 36 b can be manufactured.The digital models 26 a, 26 b can be used to automatically generatecomputer instructions of tool paths for machining the patient-specificalignment guide(s) 36 a, 36 b. These instructions can be stored in atool path data file and provided as input to a CNC mill or otherautomated maching system, and the alignment guides 36 a, 36 b can bemachined from polymer, ceramic, metal or other suitable material, andsterilized. The sterilized alignment guides 36 a, 36 b can be shipped tothe surgeon or medical facility for use during the surgical procedure.The alignment guides 36 a, 36 b can also be manufactured out of apolymer or other material using known rapid-prototyping machines andtechniques. Also, in block 53, the components of the prosthetic implantassembly 60 selected in block 49 can be manufactured. These componentscan be made from a biologically compatible material (e.g., Titanium),and can be manufactured by casting and polishing manufacturing methods.In other embodiments, the method 40 can skip block 53 because theprosthetic implant assembly 60 has been previously manufactured and theassembly 60 is simply obtained from inventory. Trial prosthetics (e.g.,prosthetic components that are temporarily implanted as a test duringsurgery) can also be manufactured in block 53.

Finally, in block 59, the kit 33 containing all of thepreviously-selected components is assembled for the particular patient.As mentioned above with respect to FIG. 1, the kit 33 can include thepatient-specific alignment guides 36 b, the prosthetic implant assembly60 selected in block 49, trial prosthetics, resection guides and otherinstruments, etc. The kit 33 can be sterilized and shipped to thesurgeon or surgical facility for surgery. Accordingly, the planning tool10 and its method 40 of use can be highly effective for tailoring thesurgery to the particular patient, and the proper components are verylikely to be available during surgery.

Referring back to block 46, if the image data 20 is insufficient forgenerating an accurate 3-d digital models (i.e., block 46 answerednegatively), then block 55 follows, and the second surgical plan 32 isgenerated according to the available 2-d image data 20. The image data20 can be displayed on the display 18. Next, in block 56, the anatomycan be measured in order to select a non-custom implant that would beappropriate for the particular patient. For instance, as shown in FIG.3, a condylar width W can be measured directly from the image data 20,and as shown in FIG. 5, a femoral component 62 with a width W closest tothe measured width W can be selected from inventory 70 (FIG. 6) forimplantation. Other anatomical dimensions and features of the anatomycan be similarly measured to identify the appropriate femoral component62 for implantation. The tibia T can be similarly measured to identifythe appropriate tibial component 64 and bearing 66. In some embodiments,2-d templates can be generated and utilized according to the image data20, and these templates can be used for selecting the components of theprosthetic implant assembly 60.

Subsequently, in block 58, a resection guide 80 can be selected from aninventory 82 of different resection guides of different sizes anddimensions. The resection guide 80 can be selected such that theresection plane(s) will be located as determined in block 55. Theresection guide 80 can be of any suitable type, such as a 4-in-1 femoralcut block, which is commercially available from Biomet, Inc. of Warsaw,Ind. Resection guides can also be selected for resecting the tibia T aswell. Other resection guides, including distal femoral cutting blocks,and/or other surgical instruments (drill guides, etc.) can be selectedin a similar fashion in block 58.

Next, the components of the non-custom prosthetic implant assembly 60can be manufactured in block 53. Alternatively, as discussed above, thecomponents can be retrieved from inventory. Finally, the kit 34containing the components of the implant assembly 60, a trial implant,surgical instruments can be assembled in block 59 and stored until theday of surgery.

In summary, the methods described above can streamline pre-operativeplanning because the surgery can be planned based on either 2-d or 3-dmedical image data 20. The surgery, the prosthetic implant assembly 60and surgical instruments can be tailored for the particular patient inan efficient and convenient fashion.

The foregoing discussion discloses and describes merely exemplaryarrangements of the present teachings. Furthermore, the mixing andmatching of features, elements and/or functions between variousembodiments is expressly contemplated herein, so that one of ordinaryskill in the art would appreciate from this disclosure that features,elements and/or functions of one embodiment may be incorporated intoanother embodiment as appropriate, unless described otherwise above.Moreover, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situationor material to the teachings of the invention without departing from theessential scope thereof. One skilled in the art will readily recognizefrom such discussion, and from the accompanying drawings and claims,that various changes, modifications and variations can be made thereinwithout departing from the spirit and scope of the present teachings asdefined in the following claims.

What is claimed is:
 1. A pre-operative planning and manufacturing methodfor orthopedic surgery comprising: obtaining pre-operative medical imagedata representing a joint portion of a patient; constructing athree-dimensional digital model of the joint portion and manufacturing apatient-specific alignment guide for the joint portion from thethree-dimensional digital model of the joint portion when the image datais sufficient to construct the three-dimensional digital model of thejoint portion, the patient-specific alignment guide having athree-dimensional patient-specific surface pre-operatively configured tonest and closely conform to a corresponding surface of the joint portionof the patient in only one position relative to the joint portion; andwhen there is insufficient data to construct the patient-specificalignment guide therefrom: determining, from the image data, a size of anon-custom implant to be implanted in the patient; selecting thenon-custom implant from a group of non-custom implants of differentsizes; and assembling a surgical kit containing the non-custom implantand a trial implant that corresponds to the non-custom implant.
 2. Themethod of claim 1, further comprising manufacturing the non-customimplant.
 3. The method of claim 1, further comprising manufacturing apatient-specific implant after constructing the three-dimensionaldigital model of the joint portion.
 4. The method of claim 1, furthercomprising determining, from the image data, a dimension of a non-customsurgical instrument configured for use during surgery for implanting thenon-custom implant.
 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the non-customsurgical instrument is a resection tool with a guide surface configuredfor guiding a cutting tool during resection of a bone of the jointportion.
 6. The method of claim 4, further comprising selecting thenon-custom surgical instrument from a plurality of non-custom surgicalinstruments of different dimensions.
 7. The method of claim 1, furthercomprising manufacturing the trial implant.
 8. The method of claim 1,further comprising including in the surgical kit a non-custom surgicalinstrument configured for use during surgery for implanting thenon-custom implant.
 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the joint portionis a knee joint and the non-custom implant is at least one of a femoralimplant and a tibial implant.
 10. A pre-operative planning andmanufacturing method for orthopedic surgery comprising: pre-operativelyobtaining medical image data that is readable on a computer, the medicalimage data containing a plurality of two-dimensional medical images of ajoint portion of a patient; pre-operatively constructing athree-dimensional digital model of the joint portion from the pluralityof two-dimensional medical images and displaying the three-dimensionaldigital model on a display of the computer when the plurality oftwo-dimensional medical images are sufficient to construct thethree-dimensional digital model of the joint portion and a correspondinga patient-specific alignment guide; selecting, based on the image data,a non-custom implant to be implanted in the patient and providing thenon-custom implant when the plurality of two-dimensional medical imagesare insufficient for use in constructing a patient-specific alignmentguide having a three-dimensional patient-specific surface configured tonest and closely conform to a corresponding surface of the joint portionof the patient relative to the joint portion, the non-custom implantchosen from a group of non-custom implants of different sizes; andassembling a surgical kit including the non-custom implant and asurgical instrument for use with the non-custom implant.
 11. The methodof claim 10, further comprising manufacturing the patient-specificalignment guide when the plurality of two-dimensional medical images aresufficient, the patient-specific alignment guide having athree-dimensional patient-specific surface pre-operatively configured tonest and closely conform to a corresponding surface of the joint portionof the patient in only one position relative to the joint portion, andfurther comprising manufacturing the selected non-custom implant whenthe plurality of two-dimensional medical images are insufficient toconstruct the patient-specific alignment guide therefrom.
 12. The methodof claim 10, further comprising manufacturing a patient-specific implantafter constructing the three-dimensional digital model of the jointportion.
 13. The method of claim 10, wherein the surgical instrument isa non-custom surgical instrument, the method further comprisingdetermining, from the medical image data, a dimension of the non-customsurgical instrument configured for use during surgery for implanting thenon-custom implant.
 14. The method of claim 13, wherein the non-customsurgical instrument is a resection tool with a guide surface configuredfor guiding a cutting tool during resection of a bone of the jointportion.
 15. The method of claim 13, further comprising selecting thenon-custom surgical instrument from a plurality of non-custom surgicalinstruments of different dimensions.
 16. The method of claim 10, furthercomprising manufacturing a trial implant that corresponds to thenon-custom implant.
 17. The method of claim 10, further comprisingincluding in the surgical a trial implant that corresponds to thenon-custom implant.
 18. The method of claim 10, wherein the jointportion is a knee joint and the non-custom implant is at least one of afemoral implant and a tibial implant.
 19. The method of claim 18,wherein the non-custom implant is selected from one of full kneereplacement implant and partial knee replacement implant.
 20. Apre-operative planning and manufacturing method for orthopedic surgeryof a knee joint of a patient comprising: obtaining pre-operative medicalimage data representing the knee joint, the medical image data includinga plurality of two-dimensional images of the knee joint; constructing athree-dimensional digital model of the knee joint and manufacturing apatient-specific alignment guide for the knee joint from thethree-dimensional digital model of the knee joint when the plurality oftwo-dimensional images of the knee joint is sufficient to construct thethree-dimensional digital model of the knee joint, the patient-specificalignment guide having a three-dimensional patient-specific surfacepre-operatively configured to nest and closely conform to acorresponding surface of the knee joint of the patient in only oneposition relative to the knee joint; determining, based on at least oneof the two-dimensional images of the knee joint, a size of a non-customimplant to be implanted in the knee joint of the patient when there isinsufficient image data to construct the patient-specific alignmentguide therefrom; determining a dimension for a non-custom surgicalinstrument configured for implanting the non-custom implant when thereis insufficient image data to construct the patient-specific alignmentguide therefrom; and assembling a kit containing a non-custom implantand a non-custom surgical instrument when there is insufficient imagedata to construct the patient-specific alignment guide therefrom.